Annexation Ranking

Re: Annexation Ranking

Postby NightShade » Nov 14, 2013 3:34 pm

Bayowolf wrote:^^^^
That's what I meant: I was a fucking idiot--I flamed Hephaestos when he didn't deserve it but it was a day after my Mom and I had a run-in with some Westboro freaks at a memorial service for my step-father. Later, you told me that my banishment was partly due to my getting caught in a crossfire between you and Bearsy--you banned him at the same time.

He always deserves it.
"The government cannot force you to buy things. It can only tax you, draft you, seize and sell your property, arrest you, incarcerate you, and execute you. It cannot tell you to buy insurance, only a gecko can do that." - Stephen Colbert
User avatar
NightShade
Opponent
 
Posts: 2050
Joined: Jun 30, 2004 5:05 am
Location: British-Columbia

Re: Annexation Ranking

Postby Bearsy » Nov 14, 2013 4:24 pm

Americalex wrote:His only saving grace is that he's a compulsive poster, and he can't help but post if he is allowed.

I take your bait.

I've just gotten used to the fact that you have your bad mood moments and you need to temp ban me to give yourself some space. Its all good.
Radical Centrist
User avatar
Bearsy
Opponent
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: May 03, 2012 11:27 pm
Location: Alberta

Re: Annexation Ranking

Postby dans » Nov 16, 2013 12:18 am

About the Westboro Baptist guys, I've always had the impression that they were some sort of offline, real life trolling group. Essentially, they start crap because they know it'll rile people up. That would explain the fact that I can't seem to fit them into any standard political profile I recognize. They're all over the place in terms of what they do and don't support. The only thing I can say to their credit, as trolls or whatnot, is that they're consistent in what they target. They'd be easier to out as trolls if they weren't.

But all this talk about previously banned users makes me realize just how much I don't know about the history of this forum/movement.
Say YES! to Puerto Rico! Tell your Representatives, tell your Senators: "Just 51% for the 51st State!"
User avatar
dans
Supporter
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Aug 29, 2012 11:01 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Annexation Ranking

Postby Bearsy » Nov 19, 2013 11:50 pm

Americalex wrote:You should see Bearsy before he went down socialist lane, he actually looked pretty decent.


To be fair, I never looked decent. Sine I joined, the longest period I wasn't on this board was the very first time I was banned, before you took ownership of the board.
Radical Centrist
User avatar
Bearsy
Opponent
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: May 03, 2012 11:27 pm
Location: Alberta

Re: Annexation Ranking

Postby Americalex » Jun 26, 2016 1:58 pm

Americalex wrote:From now on users gain a number of stars as any good armchair general should have, based on the total number of posts made on the forums.

Over 90 = 1 star
Over 450 = 2 stars
Over 900 = 3 stars
Over 4,500 = 4 stars
Over 9,000 = 5 stars

By the way if any of you notice any of you that is entitled to a star promotion, let me know!

Image
User avatar
Americalex
Supporter
 
Posts: 20023
Joined: Aug 27, 2004 2:48 am
Location: Quebec

Re: Annexation Ranking

Postby Bearsy » Jun 26, 2016 6:12 pm

As if you unbanned me. I hate you! Now give me 5 stars.
Radical Centrist
User avatar
Bearsy
Opponent
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: May 03, 2012 11:27 pm
Location: Alberta

Re: Annexation Ranking

Postby Americalex » Jun 26, 2016 6:35 pm

Bearsy wrote:As if you unbanned me. I hate you! Now give me 5 stars.

I'm willing to give you the aggregate star count of the posts made from all your accounts put together! But I'll need all of the monikers that you utilized over the years in order to validate the calculations.

Image
User avatar
Americalex
Supporter
 
Posts: 20023
Joined: Aug 27, 2004 2:48 am
Location: Quebec

Previous

Return to Community

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest