by Americalex » Jun 13, 2018 9:22 am
by Tyche » Jun 20, 2018 4:43 pm
by Americalex » Jun 26, 2018 9:32 am
by Americalex » Jun 26, 2018 2:48 pm
by Windwalker » Jun 28, 2018 10:50 pm
by Americalex » Jul 09, 2018 3:58 pm
by Windwalker » Jul 10, 2018 6:07 pm
Americalex wrote:I missed the meeting of Parti 51, it was a 3 hour drive and I simply didn't have the stomach for it when I woke up Sunday morning. I would have had to go Saturday and sleep there to be fresh for it, but things didn't turn out that way. In any case what Parti 51 is doing is worth watching, now they are truly the vanguard and leadership of the movement, I wish them well.
Meanwhile I'm content with continuing to be an armchair politician from the calmness of these secluded forums lol
Americalex wrote:Becoming part of France is a no go lol Not while they are a humanist republic. I remember Vicomte13 suggested that in the past. I get your point of levying one option against the other, creating a competitive offering situation, but that place feels more foreign to most here than would be comfortable joining. Quebec as an E.U. country? Again, the humanistry prevents it.
by Windwalker » Jul 10, 2018 7:20 pm
by Windwalker » Jul 12, 2018 4:13 pm
by Windwalker » Jul 12, 2018 7:25 pm
Windwalker wrote:One of the long-term side effects of a State given a special exemption to have mixed Loyalties with the US/UK would be young men from the region would have the option of choosing to register for either the USA or the UK draft registry (or both) without having to give up up any of their rights if they felt a draft-movement was unjustified.
The long-term side affect of allowing such, would be it would eventually filter into the entire populations of the UK and the USA... Americans could avoid the US draft by alternately registering with the UK draft, and vice-versa....
The advantage for the Military itself would be a great number of young men, voluntarily, would duel-register for both drafts.
--------------
The ability of the UK to directly draft conscripts from North America would put some real muscle behind their Brexit negotiations. the UK would have the power-projection to win a war of attrition with the combined EU Nations without the need for Washington's permission... That might be the incentive Germany finally needs to start pulling their own weight, from a security standpoint, that is. (Turkey's recent "performance" if you can even call it that, in Northern Syria pretty much proved that even a fully-integrated German/Turk military force is still no match for Russia without NATO assistance.)
The USA, on the other hand, would gain far less militarily than the UK would, but would still have a net-gain in available manpower, and more direct strategic and economic control over the continent of North America, from the perspective of military-preparedness.
---------------
-Women are allowed the personal power to choose life and death, provided that life exists within their epidermic barrier.
-Men are allowed ONLY the personal power to choose personal enslavement and/or personal death if they do not sign a contract upon reaching adulthood agreeing that the Government owns the entirety of their Person during times of war, and have no say as to which Nation their body belongs to without undergoing an extensive immigration process.
Some Justice in that, eh
Can't we just at least give a guy a chance at freedom? Maybe someday....
by Windwalker » Jul 12, 2018 8:19 pm
by Windwalker » Jul 12, 2018 9:01 pm
Women currently take it one step further by allowing themselves the right to practice a form of intra-slavery in which they claim ownership of other human beings who currently reside within their epidermic barrier.
by Windwalker » Jul 12, 2018 9:03 pm
Windwalker wrote:Women currently take it one step further by allowing themselves the right to practice a form of intra-slavery in which they claim ownership of other human beings who currently reside within their epidermic barrier.
So what you are saying is, you are pro-choice, but that you also believe that when a Women exercises the right to abort, she is practicing a crime that falls on the Slavery spectrum, not the murder/manslaughter spectrum?
by Windwalker » Jul 12, 2018 9:44 pm
by Windwalker » Jul 12, 2018 9:52 pm
Windwalker wrote:and don't forget, there is precedent for the US Military intervening to prevent the practice of Slavery. The second Women "win" their battle to become draft-eligible, is the very second the Department of Defense becomes more powerful than the Congress and the Justice combined.
by Bayowolf » Jul 14, 2018 10:50 am
Windwalker wrote:Windwalker wrote:and don't forget, there is precedent for the US Military intervening to prevent the practice of Slavery. The second Women "win" their battle to become draft-eligible, is the very second the Department of Defense becomes more powerful than the Congress and the Justice combined.
You are correct. It would give the POTUS, as Commander in Chief, the power to indiscriminately place all of his or her political opponents (or whatever group him or her chose) or even the entire US Population under the rule of the Uniformed Code of Military Justice by simple decree....
by Americalex » Jul 14, 2018 1:20 pm
by Bayowolf » Jul 15, 2018 10:33 am
Bayowolf wrote:Windwalker wrote:Windwalker wrote:and don't forget, there is precedent for the US Military intervening to prevent the practice of Slavery. The second Women "win" their battle to become draft-eligible, is the very second the Department of Defense becomes more powerful than the Congress and the Justice combined.
You are correct. It would give the POTUS, as Commander in Chief, the power to indiscriminately place all of his or her political opponents (or whatever group him or her chose) or even the entire US Population under the rule of the Uniformed Code of Military Justice by simple decree....
How would he do that under the Constitution?
by Windwalker » Jul 15, 2018 3:22 pm
by Americalex » Nov 16, 2018 11:42 am
Americalex wrote:It's a judeo-christian form of humor, the joke's on you I guess